For California PI firms
California Personal Injury Case Management Software
California's pure comparative-negligence rule means even a 99% at-fault plaintiff can recover 1%. Case volume per capita is the highest in the US; firms differentiate on treatment-provider networks and lien pre-settlement discipline.
Statute of limitations
2 years
Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §335.1
Negligence rule
Pure comparative negligence
What Verdix does for a California PI firm
- SOL tracker auto-set to 2 years from incident date, with 90/60/30/14/7-day email alerts to the firm owner.
- Branded intake form at /intake/[your-slug] with state pre-filled to California. Spanish toggle available in Settings.
- AI-drafted demand letters that cite Cal. Code Civ. Proc. §335.1 and the pure comparative negligence rule when the fact pattern needs it.
- Document extraction on police reports, medical bills, and insurance correspondence — Claude pulls dates, parties, and dollar amounts into the intake record.
- Lien negotiation workflow with provider-rate reduction prompts and net-to-client math.
Start free trial
See the AI demand, SOL tracker, and intake form on your own California cases.
Start free trialCommon questions (California)
What's California's PI SOL?
Two years under CCP §335.1. Government-entity defendants require a 6-month notice-of-claim under the Tort Claims Act — Verdix's deadline tracker handles both the SOL and the 6-month claim window.
Why is comparative negligence a bigger deal in California?
Pure comparative means Verdix's fault-clarity triage saves time — you can take borderline-fault cases that modified-rule states would bar. The settlement model needs to apply the fault reduction before the final net to client; Verdix's settlement statement calc handles it.
Also serving